Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
EPYC 9375F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1256%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,419) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9375F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9375F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 2,981, a 7.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 26,020 (0.1% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+9% | 3.85 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 95,768+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+7% | 2,981 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000 | 26,020 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9375F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 197.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 12 (EPYC 9375F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 128 (EPYC 9375F) — the EPYC 9375F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 6 TB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the EPYC 9375F debuted at $5306. At current prices ($1419 vs $108), the EPYC 9375F is $1311 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 65.4 pts/$ vs 886.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9375F the 172.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-72% | $5306 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1419 | $108-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 886.7+1256% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and EPYC 9375F
