Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
EPYC 9375F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,444) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3124%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,444) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9375F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9375F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9375F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX scores 94,737 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,500 vs 2,981, a 66.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 26,020 (26.2% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.85 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 94,737 | 95,768+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 66,403 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,500 | 2,981+99% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | 26,020+30% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9375F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs 12 (EPYC 9375F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 6 TB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X; EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX launched at $6499 MSRP, while the EPYC 9375F debuted at $5306. At current prices ($3444 vs $108), the EPYC 9375F is $3336 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 886.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9375F the 188% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6499 | $5306-18% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3444 | $108-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 886.7+3124% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9375F
