Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,182) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+403%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,182) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX scores 106,263 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 156.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 83,982 vs 8,191 (164.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,454, a 75% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 31,000 vs 5,783 (137.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+26% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+38% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+967% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 106,263+716% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 83,982+925% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+120% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 31,000+436% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+1500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX launched at $4099 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($4182 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $4080 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX delivers 25.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 133.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4099 | $160-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4182 | $102-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.4 | 127.7+403% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX and Core i5-10400F
