T400 4GB vs GeForce GTX 780M SLI
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank 63 and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI is on rank 209, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T400 4GB is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The T400 4GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400 4GB.
| Insight | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 780M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and GeForce GTX 780M SLI
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,864 points.
Graphics Performance
The T400 4GB scores 3,803 and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI reaches 3,864 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 780M SLI uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 780M SLI).
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803 | 3,864+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3072+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 780M SLI's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+557% | 19.3 |
Value Analysis
The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | N14E-GTX |
| Release | May 6 2021 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #518 | #340 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T400 4GB and GeForce GTX 780M SLI
