T400 4GB vs GeForce GTX 1650

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

T400 4GB

3,803

0.0%

GeForce GTX 980 SLI (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+106.9%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank #63 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

97%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

97%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

96%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

92%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

90%

#48

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

618%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

100%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

99%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

93%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

91%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

91%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

91%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 106.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400 4GB.

Insight	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-106.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+106.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $99 for the T400 4GB, it costs 24% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 173.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+173.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

T400 4GB Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and GeForce GTX 1650

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the T400 4GB scores 3,803 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 106.9%. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3,803	7,869+107%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.094 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+173%
Boost Clock	1425 MHz	1665 MHz+17%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	384 KB	896 KB+133%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T400 4GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (T400 4GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen.

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 156mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	T400 4GB	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	156mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	126.8+21%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The T400 4GB launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 24.2% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (T400 4GB) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 173.2% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).