T400 4GB vs FirePro S7150

Performance Spectrum - GPU

T400 4GB

30

3,803

+0.9%

GeForce GTX 980 SLI (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

FirePro S7150

150

3,770

0.0%

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U

Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3350GE

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank 63 and the FirePro S7150 is on rank 315, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

97%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

97%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

96%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

92%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

90%

#48

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

618%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

100%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

99%

#69

Radeon Pro W5500

MSRP: $399|Avg: $300

93%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

91%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

91%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

91%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

100%

#299

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9410%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

100%

#316

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

98%

#317

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#318

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

97%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

97%

#320

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

96%

#321

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

94%

#322

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

90%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

90%

#324

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

89%

#325

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

88%

#326

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

87%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

87%

#328

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

85%

#329

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T400 4GB uses modern memory architecture. The T400 4GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S7150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The T400 4GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $459 for the FirePro S7150, it costs 78% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 367.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+367.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($99)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

T400 4GB Benchmark Check

FirePro S7150 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and FirePro S7150

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The T400 4GB scores 3,803 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
G3D Mark Score	3,803	3,770
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.094 TFLOPS	3.768 TFLOPS+244%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T400 4GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T400 4GB) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) — the T400 4GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (T400 4GB) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 5.0.

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	UVD 5.0
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	T400 4GB	FirePro S7150
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	156mm	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	126.8+405%	25.1

💰

Value Analysis

The T400 4GB launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The T400 4GB costs 78.4% less ($360 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (T400 4GB) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the T400 4GB offers 368.3% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).