CPU
GPU
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank 63 and the GeForce MX450 is on rank 307, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The T400 4GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $200 for the GeForce MX450, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 106.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+106.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and GeForce MX450
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The T400 4GB scores 3,803 and the GeForce MX450 reaches 3,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+2% | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+195% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 1575 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 25W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8 | 148.8+17% |
Value Analysis
The T400 4GB launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The T400 4GB costs 50.5% less ($101 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (T400 4GB) vs 18.6 (GeForce MX450) — the T400 4GB offers 106.5% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | T400 4GB | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-36% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-51% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4+106% | 18.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #518 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T400 4GB and GeForce MX450
