T400 4GB vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T400 4GB is positioned at rank 63 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 is on rank 148, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T400 4GB uses modern memory architecture. The T400 4GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $99 for the T400 4GB, it costs 14% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 12.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T400 4GB and Radeon Pro WX 4100
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The T400 4GB scores 3,803 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T400 4GB is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (T400 4GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz+19% | 1201 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T400 4GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The T400 4GB draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 50% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T400 4GB) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+72% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The T400 4GB launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 and now averages $85. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 14.1% less ($14 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.4 (T400 4GB) vs 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 12.8% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | T400 4GB | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-60% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99 | $85-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4 | 43.3+13% |
| Codename | TU117 | Baffin |
| Release | May 6 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #518 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T400 4GB and Radeon Pro WX 4100
