Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Tesla C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla C2070

238

3,121

0.0%

GeForce GT 755M

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+152.1%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2070 is positioned at rank #287 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

100%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

96%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

96%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

94%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

93%

#272

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7102%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

100%

#288

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

100%

#290

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

99%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

97%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

95%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

95%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

94%

#299

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

93%

#300

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

93%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 152.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla C2070 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-152.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+152.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (248mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $38), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 27.7% better value per dollar than the Tesla C2070.

Insight	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+27.7%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($38)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla C2070 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2070 and GeForce GTX 1650

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 152.1%. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3,121	7,869+152%
Architecture	Fermi	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	448	896+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+190%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	—	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	—	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 104.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 248mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Tesla C2070	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	238W	75W-68%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	248mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	13.1	104.9+701%

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $38, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Tesla C2070 costs 49.3% less ($37 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.1 (Tesla C2070) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 27.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).