Tesla C2070 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2070 is positioned at rank #287 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 281% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2070.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-281%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+281%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $38 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($38) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2070 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 281%. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,121 | 11,892+281% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 2560+471% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+774% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | — | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 58.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 248mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 130W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 248mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 91.5+598% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $38, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Tesla C2070 costs 74.7% less ($112 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.1 (Tesla C2070) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Tesla C2070 offers 3.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $249-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $38-75% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1+4% | 79.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | GA106 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #575 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2070 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
