Tesla K20c
VS
Tesla K40c

Tesla K20c vs Tesla K40c

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

2012Core: 706 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K20c is positioned at rank 325 and the Tesla K40c is on rank 378, so the Tesla K20c offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20c

#310
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10628%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
100%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
99%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
99%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
94%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
93%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
92%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
91%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
91%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
91%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
90%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
89%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
88%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c

#363
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
25471%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
100%
#379
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
97%
#380
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
97%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
91%
#382
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
91%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
81%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
76%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
74%
#386
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
74%
#387
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
72%
#388
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
72%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
69%
#390
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
66%
#391
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
66%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
60%
#393
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla K40c is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K20c.

InsightTesla K20cTesla K40c
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla K40c offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla K40c holds the technical lead. Priced at $500 (vs $500), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla K20cTesla K40c
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1.4%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K20c and Tesla K40c

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla K20c scores 4,432 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K20c is built on Kepler while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K20c) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c).

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
G3D Mark Score
4,432
4,495+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2496
2880+15%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.524 TFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs
40
48+20%
TMUs
208
240+15%
L1 Cache
208 KB
240 KB+15%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
1.5 MB+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
1.5 MB+20%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla K20c) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
DirectX
11_0
11_0
Max Displays
0
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K20c draws 225W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 8.5% difference. The Tesla K20c is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K20c) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
TDP
225W-8%
245W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Slots
2
2
Perf/Watt
19.7+8%
18.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla K20c launched at $3199 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699 and now averages $500. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.9 (Tesla K20c) vs 9.0 (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c offers 1.1% better value. The Tesla K40c is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureTesla K20cTesla K40c
MSRP
$3199-58%
$7699
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$500
Performance per Dollar
8.9
9.0+1%
Codename
GK110
GK180
Release
November 12 2012
October 8 2013
Ranking
#549
#465