
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Tesla K20c

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

Tesla K20c
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20c
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K20c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla K20c offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Tesla K20c

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Tesla K20c
The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,498+1% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2496+95% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+36% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80 | 208+160% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+54% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c has 2 GB. The Tesla K20c offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-71% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2+251% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199 and now averages $500. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 8.9 (Tesla K20c) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.9 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GK110 |
| Release | April 24 2018 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #464 | #549 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















