Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Tesla K20c

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

2012Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Tesla K20c Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla K20c is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (4,498 vs 4,432), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tesla K20c is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla K20c makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL scores 4,498 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLTesla K20c
G3D Mark Score
4,498+1%
4,432
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2496+95%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.588 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
80
208+160%
L1 Cache
320 KB+54%
208 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLTesla K20c
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c carries 2 GB. Tesla K20c gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLTesla K20c
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLTesla K20c
TDP
65W-71%
225W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
69.2+251%
19.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL came in at $0, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX Vega M GLTesla K20c
MSRP
$0-100%
$3199
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
1.4
Codename
Polaris 22
GK110
Release
April 24 2018
November 12 2012
Ranking
#464
#549

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.