Tesla K40c
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

Tesla K40c vs GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

2025

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank 378 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is on rank 13, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c

#363
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
25471%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
100%
#379
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
97%
#380
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
97%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
91%
#382
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
91%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
81%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
76%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
74%
#386
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
74%
#387
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
72%
#388
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
72%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
69%
#390
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
66%
#391
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
66%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
60%
#393
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
122%
#8
110%
#9
110%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
99%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla K40c is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the Tesla K40c, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 892.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+892.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla K40c scores 4,495 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) reaches 4,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
4,495
4,463
Architecture
Kepler
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
3 nm
Shading Units
2880
3584+24%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla K40c comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla K40c) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
DirectX
11_0
12 (12_1)+9%
Max Displays
0
4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 132.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
TDP
245W
50W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
18.3
89.3+388%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 892.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureTesla K40cGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP
$7699
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$50-90%
Performance per Dollar
9.0
89.3+892%
Codename
GK180
GN22-X2
Release
October 8 2013
January 2 2025
Ranking
#465
#não classificado