Tesla K40c vs GeForce MX550
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
GeForce MX550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank 378 and the GeForce MX550 is on rank 187, so the GeForce MX550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX550 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The GeForce MX550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K40c is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX550.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $500 for the Tesla K40c, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 232.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+232.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and GeForce MX550
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K40c scores 4,495 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1320 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 4,480 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+181% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS+87% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1320 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+650% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 2 MB+770% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 163% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 25W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.3 | 179.2+879% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K40c launched at $7699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX550 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 232.2% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7699 | $150-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 29.9+232% |
| Codename | GK180 | TU117S |
| Release | October 8 2013 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #465 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K40c and GeForce MX550
