Tesla K40c vs Radeon Pro 465
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank 378 and the Radeon Pro 465 is on rank 152, so the Radeon Pro 465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40c.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 236.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and Radeon Pro 465
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K40c scores 4,495 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+181% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS+172% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 907 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+275% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 256 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 150% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.3 | 129.7+609% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K40c launched at $7699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 465 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 offers 236.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40c | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7699 | $500-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 30.3+237% |
| Codename | GK180 | Baffin |
| Release | October 8 2013 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #465 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K40c and Radeon Pro 465
