Tesla K40c vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Tesla K40c

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla K40c

245

4,495

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

4,500

+0.1%

Radeon RX 550X

Radeon HD 6990

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank 378 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is on rank 86, so the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c

#363

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

25471%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

100%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

97%

#380

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

97%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

91%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

91%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

81%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

76%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

74%

#386

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

74%

#387

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

72%

#388

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

72%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

69%

#390

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

66%

#391

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

66%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

60%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

98%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#76

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

239%

#78

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

217%

#79

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

216%

#83

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

196%

#84

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

195%

#86

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

100%

#92

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

97%

#95

GeForce GT 555M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

95%

#97

GeForce GTX 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

95%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40c.

Insight	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 901.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+901.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla K40c Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla K40c scores 4,495 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,495	4,500
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2880+181%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.046 TFLOPS+105%	2.462 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	876 MHz	1275 MHz+46%
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	240+275%	64
L1 Cache	240 KB	256 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 116.1% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Tesla K40c	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
TDP	245W	65W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	18.3	69.2+278%

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla K40c launched at $7699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 900% better value. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).