Tesla K40c vs GeForce RTX 3070
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K40c is positioned at rank #378 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 393.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40c.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-393.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+393.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $500 for the Tesla K40c, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1133.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1133.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40c and GeForce RTX 3070
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K40c scores 4,495 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 393.3%. The Tesla K40c is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40c) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 22,172+393% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 5888+104% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+302% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1725 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 240+30% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 5.8 MB+2422% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla K40c comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla K40c) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 Ultimate+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40c draws 245W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 10.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40c) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 220W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.3 | 100.8+451% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K40c launched at $7699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 60% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Tesla K40c) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1132.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40c | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7699 | $499-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $200-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 110.9+1132% |
| Codename | GK180 | GA104 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #465 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K40c and GeForce RTX 3070
