Tesla M10 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Tesla M10
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla M10 is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Tesla M10?
Comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the Tesla M10 highlights the difference between a modern gaming and creative powerhouse and a specialized legacy server GPU. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 Ada Lovelace card built for efficiency and high-refresh gaming. The Tesla M10 is a Maxwell-based server GPU from 2016 designed for high-density virtualization and VDI workloads.\n\nIn terms of raw performance and versatility, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is in a different league. It features dedicated Ray Tracing cores, AI-driven DLSS 3 Frame Generation, and a modern 16GB VRAM buffer that is excellent for high-resolution textures. The Tesla M10, while possessing a large aggregate memory (32GB spread across four GPUs), lacks the individual core speed and modern feature set to compete in 2024 tasks. It also requires specialized server cooling and lacks traditional video outputs.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the definitive choice for any individual user or creative professional. The Tesla M10 is a niche tool for legacy server clusters and data centers, but for gaming, video editing, or modern AI development, the 40-series card offers a level of performance and accessibility that far exceeds the aging server hardware.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 613.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M10.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-613.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+613.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $500 for the Tesla M10, it costs 24% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 839.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+839.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M10 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla M10 scores 3,173 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 613.9%. The Tesla M10 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (Tesla M10) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,173 | 22,651+614% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 ×4 | 4352+580% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 | 22.06 TFLOPS+1219% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 2535 MHz+94% |
| ROPs | 16 ×4 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 ×4 | 136+240% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 4.3 MB+1287% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M10 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M10 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla M10) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Tesla M10) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M10) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M10 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M10) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 160W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 141.6+904% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M10 launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 24% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Tesla M10) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 846% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $399-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $380-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 59.6+846% |
| Codename | GM107 | AD106 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #570 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M10 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
