
Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 470

Tesla M10
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla M10 is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tesla M10 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Tesla M10 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 470 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 470.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 470 holds the technical lead. Priced at $349 (vs $500), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 42% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+42%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M10 and GeForce GTX 470

Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.

GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M10 scores 3,173 and the GeForce GTX 470 reaches 3,145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M10 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 470 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Tesla M10) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 470). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470).
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,173 | 3,145 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 ×4+43% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4+54% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×4 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 ×4 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M10 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB. The Tesla M10 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla M10) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+60% | 1.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Tesla M10) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 470). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M10) vs None (GeForce GTX 470). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M10 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 470's 215W — a 4.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M10) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 215W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 14.6+4% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M10 launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 470 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The GeForce GTX 470 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Tesla M10) vs 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) — the GeForce GTX 470 offers 42.9% better value. The Tesla M10 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Tesla M10 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $349-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $349-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 9.0+43% |
| Codename | GM107 | GF100 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #570 | #572 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











