Tesla M10 vs Radeon 660M
Tesla M10
Popular choices:
Radeon 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M10 is positioned at rank 334 and the Radeon 660M is on rank 399, so the Tesla M10 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M10.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M10 and Radeon 660M
Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Radeon 660M
The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M10 scores 3,173 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M10 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Tesla M10) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,173 | 3,221+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 ×4+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4+15% | 1.459 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1900 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 16 ×4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 ×4+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M10 draws 225W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M10) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 80.5+471% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | May 18 2016 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #570 | #565 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M10 and Radeon 660M
