
Tesla M10 vs Tesla K40m

Tesla M10
Popular choices:

Tesla K40m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M10 is positioned at rank 334 and the Tesla K40m is on rank 137, so the Tesla K40m offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40m
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40m.
| Insight | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M10 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M10 and Tesla K40m

Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.

Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M10 scores 3,173 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M10 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Tesla M10) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,173 | 3,143 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 ×4 | 2880+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 | 5.046 TFLOPS+202% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+49% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 ×4 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 ×4 | 240+500% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+33% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla M10) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M10 draws 225W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 8.5% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M10) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-8% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1+10% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M10 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla M10 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GK110B |
| Release | May 18 2016 | November 22 2013 |
| Ranking | #570 | #573 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















