
Tesla M60 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

Tesla M60
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M60 is positioned at rank 277 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is on rank 12, so the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M60
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M60 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel).
| Insight | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M60 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M60 and GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M60 scores 7,002 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M60 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Tesla M60) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60) vs 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,002 | 6,968 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+51% | 3.195 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1560 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Tesla M60) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla M60) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)).
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 (2x) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M60 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)'s 50W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M60) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.3 | 139.4+498% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #355 | #352 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















