
Tesla M60 vs Radeon RX 580X

Tesla M60
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla M60 is positioned at rank #277 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M60
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 580X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 580X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M60 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 580X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M60.
| Insight | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 580X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $250 for the Tesla M60, it costs 76% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 346% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+346%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M60 and Radeon RX 580X

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

Radeon RX 580X
The Radeon RX 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,495 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla M60 scores 7,002 versus the Radeon RX 580X's 7,495 — the Radeon RX 580X leads by 7%. The Tesla M60 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Tesla M60) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,002 | 7,495+7% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.175 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1340 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M60 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla M60) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 580X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 580X).
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 (2x) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M60 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 580X's 185W — a 47.4% difference. The Radeon RX 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M60) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 185W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.3 | 40.5+74% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M60 launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon RX 580X launched at $229 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 580X costs 76% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Tesla M60) vs 124.9 (Radeon RX 580X) — the Radeon RX 580X offers 346.1% better value. The Radeon RX 580X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M60 | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $229-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $60-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 124.9+346% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #355 | #337 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















