
Tesla M60 vs GRID P40-24Q

Tesla M60
Popular choices:

GRID P40-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M60 is positioned at rank 277 and the GRID P40-24Q is on rank 338, so the Tesla M60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M60
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-24Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-24Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M60.
| Insight | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-24Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P40-24Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $250), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M60 and GRID P40-24Q

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

GRID P40-24Q
The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M60 scores 7,002 and the GRID P40-24Q reaches 7,057 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M60 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID P40-24Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Tesla M60) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,002 | 7,057 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla M60) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q).
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 (2x) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M60 draws 300W versus the GRID P40-24Q's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID P40-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M60) vs 350W (GRID P40-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 225W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.3 | 31.4+35% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M60 launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GRID P40-24Q launched at $5699 and now averages $200. The GRID P40-24Q costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Tesla M60) vs 35.3 (GRID P40-24Q) — the GRID P40-24Q offers 26.1% better value.
| Feature | Tesla M60 | GRID P40-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000-47% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 35.3+26% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #355 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











