
Titan X Pascal vs GeForce GTX 1060

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 35.7% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+35.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-35.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $200), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 145.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1060

Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Titan X Pascal leads by 35.7%. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660+36% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS+24% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1733 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+38% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Titan X Pascal comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 150% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Titan X Pascal has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s+150% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 55.9+2% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 70% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 145.5% better value.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $249-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $60-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3 | 167.7+146% |
| Codename | GP102 | GP104 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #198 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















