Titan X Pascal vs Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Titan X Pascal offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Titan X Pascal offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $3,500 for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1605.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1605.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo reaches 14,018 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660 | 14,018+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096 ×2+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1720 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256 ×2+14% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+30% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Titan X Pascal comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The Titan X Pascal offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — a 80% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 864 GB/s+80% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 62.1% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-47% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6+85% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399 and now averages $3500. The Titan X Pascal costs 94.3% less ($3300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the Titan X Pascal offers 1607.5% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-73% | $4399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-94% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+1608% | 4.0 |
| Codename | GP102 | Vega 20 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #198 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Titan X Pascal and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
