Titan X Pascal vs Arc B570
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc B570 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Arc B570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Titan X Pascal.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Titan X Pascal offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $219 for the Arc B570, it costs 9% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 6.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and Arc B570
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660 | 14,060+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS | 11.52 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 2500 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 4.5 MB+246% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 380 GB/s (Arc B570) — a 26.3% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s+26% | 380 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+140% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 50% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 249mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 93.7+72% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Titan X Pascal costs 8.7% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Titan X Pascal offers 6.4% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $219-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-9% | $219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+6% | 64.2 |
| Codename | GP102 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #198 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Titan X Pascal and Arc B570
