Titan X Pascal vs Radeon RX 6600 LE
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6600 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Titan X Pascal.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6600 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $160 versus $200 for the Titan X Pascal, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 25.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($160) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX 6600 LE
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660 | 13,758 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS+23% | 8.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 2495 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Titan X Pascal lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 114.3% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Titan X Pascal has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s+114% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 61.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 132W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 104.2+91% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329 and now averages $160. The Radeon RX 6600 LE costs 20% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 86.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 25.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $329-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $160-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3 | 86.0+26% |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #198 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX 6600 LE
