
Titan X Pascal vs A10G

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:

A10G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The A10G uses modern memory architecture. The A10G likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Titan X Pascal offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 904.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+904.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and A10G

Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the A10G reaches 13,598 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the A10G uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 9,216 (A10G). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1710 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660 | 13,598 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 9216+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS | 31.52 TFLOPS+187% |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1710 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224 | 288+29% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 9 MB+592% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Titan X Pascal comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the A10G has 24 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) vs 6 MB (A10G) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12 Ultimate (A10G). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs NVENC 7th Gen (A10G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the A10G's 150W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 500W (A10G). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 90.7+66% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the A10G launched at $2500 and now averages $2000. The Titan X Pascal costs 90% less ($1800 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 6.8 (A10G) — the Titan X Pascal offers 904.4% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | A10G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-52% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-90% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+904% | 6.8 |
| Codename | GP102 | GA102 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #198 | #182 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















