Titan X Pascal vs GeForce RTX 2060
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Titan X Pascal offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $200 for the Titan X Pascal, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 72.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+72.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Titan X Pascal and GeForce RTX 2060
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Titan X Pascal scores 13,660 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Titan X Pascal is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Titan X Pascal) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1531 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,660 | 14,114+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+87% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.97 TFLOPS+70% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1680 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+87% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 1.9 MB+46% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Titan X Pascal comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 42.9% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s+43% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Titan X Pascal) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Titan X Pascal draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Titan X Pascal) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.6 | 88.2+62% |
Value Analysis
The Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 40% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 72.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Titan X Pascal | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $349-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $120-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3 | 117.6+72% |
| Codename | GP102 | TU106 |
| Release | August 2 2016 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #198 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Titan X Pascal and GeForce RTX 2060
