Turion II P520 vs Xeon E5410

AMD

Turion II P520

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5410

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E5410 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E5410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E5410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5410, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5410

2007

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,032 vs 2,047).
  • Launch MSRP is still $256 MSRP, while Turion II P520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P520 better than Xeon E5410?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5410 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II P520 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Turion II P520 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Turion II P520 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5410 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion II P520 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $256 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5410 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion II P520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E5410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5410

The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.

Processing Power

The Turion II P520 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5410 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 — a 149.8% clock advantage for the Turion II P520. The Turion II P520 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II P520 scores 2,047 against the Xeon E5410's 2,032 — a 0.7% lead for the Turion II P520.

FeatureTurion II P520Xeon E5410
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+597%
0.33 GHz
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB (total)+200%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,047
2,032
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II P520 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5410 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion II P520Xeon E5410
Socket
S1g4
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion II P520) / VT-x (Xeon E5410). Primary use case: Xeon E5410 targets Server.

FeatureTurion II P520Xeon E5410
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server