
U300

Xeon W-2223
U300 vs Xeon W-2223 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
U300 vs Xeon W-2223 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
U300 vs Xeon W-2223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2223 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,492 vs 8,593).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2223, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W-2223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2223 better than U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
U300 vs Xeon W-2223 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

U300
The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-2223
The Xeon W-2223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,593 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon W-2223 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the U300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2223 — a 12% clock advantage for the U300. In PassMark, the U300 scores 8,492 against the Xeon W-2223's 8,593 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-2223. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2223.
| Feature | U300 | Xeon W-2223 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8.25 MB+3% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| PassMark | 8,492 | 8,593+1% |
Memory & Platform
The U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2223 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | U300 | Xeon W-2223 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













