Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs U300

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs U300 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

4 / 8

8,527

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

U300

5 / 6

8,492

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs U300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

U300

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,492 vs 8,527).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G better than U300?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $193 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs U300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

U300

The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G versus 4.4 GHz on the U300 — a 12% clock advantage for the U300. The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is built on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G scores 8,527 against the U300's 8,492 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	U300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	5 / 6+25%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	8,527	8,492

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.