
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Xeon W-2123
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Xeon W-2123 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Xeon W-2123 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Xeon W-2123: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018Why buy it
- β +0.1% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $101 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- β Delivers 52.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.2 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2123, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-2123
2017Why buy it
- β +106.3% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (8,519 vs 8,527).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 44.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- β84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G better than Xeon W-2123?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Xeon W-2123 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon W-2123
The Xeon W-2123 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,519 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Xeon W-2123 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2123 β identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the Raven Ridge (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2123 uses Skylake (server) (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G scores 8,527 against the Xeon W-2123's 8,519 β a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2123.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | Xeon W-2123 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8.25 MB (total)+106% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017β2019) | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 8,527 | 8,519 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,172 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 4,215 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2123 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | Xeon W-2123 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G) / Yes (Xeon W-2123).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | Xeon W-2123 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was priced at $193, while the Xeon W-2123 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($193 vs $294), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G delivers 44.2 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2123 β making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G the 41.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | Xeon W-2123 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193-34% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.2+52% | 29.0 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














