
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GTX 960M

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is positioned at rank 37 and the GeForce GTX 960M is on rank 35, so the GeForce GTX 960M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 960M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 960M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 960M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 960M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.9% better value per dollar than the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GTX 960M

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 960M reaches 3,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,375+2% |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 960M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 960M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+390% | 45.0 |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 67.5 (GeForce GTX 960M) — the GeForce GTX 960M offers 2% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.2 | 67.5+2% |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | GM107 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #432 | #552 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















