UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GTX 1650
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is positioned at rank #37 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 137.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-137.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+137.7%) |
| Longevity | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 58.4% better value per dollar than the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GTX 1650
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) scores 3,311 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 137.7%.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 7,869+138% |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+110% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 58.5% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-66% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.2 | 104.9+58% |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | TU117 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #432 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GTX 1650
