
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Quadro P600

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:

Quadro P600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is positioned at rank #37 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $60 for the Quadro P600, it costs 17% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 19.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Quadro P600

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,318 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 has 2 GB. The Quadro P600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 90.9% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-63% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+166% | 83.0 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0 and now averages $60. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 55.3 (Quadro P600) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 19.7% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.2+20% | 55.3 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #432 | #558 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















