
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is positioned at rank 37 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI is on rank 285, so the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT 755M SLI.
| Insight | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GT 755M SLI

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) scores 3,311 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI reaches 3,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,280 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 755M SLI's 2W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 2W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7 | 1640.0+643% |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) vs 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 0.9% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.2 | 65.6 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | N14P-? |
| Release | March 30 2021 | November 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #432 | #554 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















