UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Radeon 820M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:
Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 820M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $25 for the Radeon 820M, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon 820M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 and the Radeon 820M reaches 2,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3+, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 128 (Radeon 820M). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,200+3% | 2,143 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 128+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | 2900 MHz+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 820M has 2 GB. The Radeon 820M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the Radeon 820M's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 350W (Radeon 820M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 146.7+105% | 71.4 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 85.7 (Radeon 820M) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 28.4% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+28% | 85.7 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Krackan Point |
| Release | March 30 2021 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #744 | #669 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon 820M
