UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GRID M60-1B
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $120 for the GRID M60-1B, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 485.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+485.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and GRID M60-1B
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,200 | 2,256+3% |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 2048+6300% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+23% | 1178 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-1B has 2 GB. The GRID M60-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 146.7+1367% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 83.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 485.1% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-83% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+485% | 18.8 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GM204 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #744 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and GRID M60-1B
