UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs RadeonT 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

97%

#216

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

484%

#218

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

439%

#219

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

438%

#223

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

398%

#224

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

395%

#226

RadeonT 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

99%

#230

Maxwell GPU Surface Book

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

98%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

96%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

95%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

94%

#239

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

92%

#240

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

Insight	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	RadeonT 660M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Benchmark Check

RadeonT 660M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and RadeonT 660M

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,200	2,221
Architecture	Gen. 12	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	32	384+1100%
Boost Clock	1450 MHz	1900 MHz+31%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 660M has 2 GB. The RadeonT 660M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 90.9% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.