UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
VS
Radeon HD 5870

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Radeon HD 5870

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5870

2009Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is significantly newer (2021 vs 2009). The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5870 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5870 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (280mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the Radeon HD 5870, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 152.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+152.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon HD 5870

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5870

The Radeon HD 5870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 23 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 188W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs scores 2,200 and the Radeon HD 5870 reaches 2,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is built on Gen. 12 while the Radeon HD 5870 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5870).

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
G3D Mark Score
2,200
2,180
Architecture
Gen. 12
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
32
1600+4900%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5870 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5870 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 5870's 188W — a 170.4% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5870). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
TDP
15W-92%
188W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
146.7+1165%
11.6
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 5870 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) vs 43.6 (Radeon HD 5870) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 152.3% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2009).

FeatureUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsRadeon HD 5870
MSRP
$0-100%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$20-60%
$50
Performance per Dollar
110.0+152%
43.6
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
Cypress
Release
March 30 2021
September 23 2009
Ranking
#744
#663