
Xeon 6357P

Xeon Gold 5220R
Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Gold 5220R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Gold 5220R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Gold 5220R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6357P
2025Why buy it
- β +109.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- β +49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- β 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,327 vs 2,784).
- βLower PassMark (30,372 vs 30,401).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,780 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6357P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6357P better than Xeon Gold 5220R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Gold 5220R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6357P
The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6357P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon Gold 5220R has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R β a 24.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6357P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6357P scores 30,401 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 β a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,784 vs 1,327, a 70.9% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | Xeon 6357P | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 30,401 | 30,372 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,784+110% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,769 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6357P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5220R β the Xeon 6357P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5220R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon 6357P) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon 6357P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) β the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | Xeon 6357P | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.
| Feature | Xeon 6357P | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Edge Server / Workstation | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














