Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6357P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 255H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 26W instead of 80W, a 54W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics 140T, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,769 vs 15,700).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 26W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 255H

2025

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 26W instead of 80W, a 54W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics 140T, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,769 vs 15,700).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 26W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than Xeon 6357P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6357P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 255H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 255H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 255H is the better fit. You are getting 23% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 255H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 7 255H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 27.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 255H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 7 255H Benchmark Check

Xeon 6357P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	309 FPS	257 FPS
medium	278 FPS	246 FPS
high	232 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	251 FPS	222 FPS
medium	201 FPS	190 FPS
high	163 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	173 FPS	153 FPS
medium	139 FPS	130 FPS
high	107 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255H Open Xeon 6357P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	773 FPS	620 FPS
medium	636 FPS	523 FPS
high	519 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	408 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	532 FPS
medium	567 FPS	467 FPS
high	466 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	346 FPS
4K
low	412 FPS	311 FPS
medium	340 FPS	278 FPS
high	314 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	233 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255H Open Xeon 6357P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	773 FPS	646 FPS
medium	773 FPS	529 FPS
high	773 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	662 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	773 FPS	588 FPS
medium	735 FPS	489 FPS
high	635 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	544 FPS	369 FPS
4K
low	642 FPS	424 FPS
medium	534 FPS	369 FPS
high	483 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	285 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255H Open Xeon 6357P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	773 FPS	760 FPS
medium	773 FPS	760 FPS
high	773 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	773 FPS	652 FPS
1440p
low	773 FPS	760 FPS
medium	773 FPS	704 FPS
high	703 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	609 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	612 FPS	537 FPS
medium	540 FPS	490 FPS
high	489 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	383 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 255H Open Xeon 6357P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon 6357P

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 1.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,784, a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 12,769 (20.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,932+2%	30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	2,784
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,700+23%	12,769

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 20 (Xeon 6357P) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Socket	FCBGA2049	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+40%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon 6357P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics 140T	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-End Laptop	Edge Server / Workstation