Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6357P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6357P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6357P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 255H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 26W instead of 80W, a 54W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics 140T, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,769 vs 15,700).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 26W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than Xeon 6357P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6357P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 255H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 255H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 27.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 255H is the stronger fit. You are getting 23% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 255H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 7 255H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 255H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6357P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 1.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,784, a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 12,769 (20.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,932+2%	30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	2,784
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,700+23%	12,769

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 20 (Xeon 6357P) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Socket	FCBGA2049	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+33%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+40%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon 6357P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255H	Xeon 6357P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics 140T	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-End Laptop	Edge Server / Workstation