PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅+133.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 80W instead of 165W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8260

2019

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,190 vs 2,784).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌106.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6357P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than Xeon Platinum 8260?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6357P is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 pulls ahead with 2.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8260 also has the bigger cache pool with 49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6357P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8260 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6357P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8260 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8260 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6357P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

Xeon Platinum 8260

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6357P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 6357P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6357P scores 30,401 against the Xeon Platinum 8260's 30,720 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 18,500 (2.7% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,784 vs 1,190, a 80.2% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,769 vs 6,946 (59.1% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260.

Feature	Xeon 6357P	Xeon Platinum 8260
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+31%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	35.75 MB (total)+49%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	30,401	30,720+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000	18,500+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,784+134%	1,190
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,769+84%	6,946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6357P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — the Xeon 6357P supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon 6357P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon 6357P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260) — the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260).

Feature	Xeon 6357P	Xeon Platinum 8260
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700; Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.