Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8180M

Intel

Xeon 6357P

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8180M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8180M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8180M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 80W instead of 205W, a 125W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8180M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 25,000).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 39 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8180M

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +60.4% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).
  • 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 156.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 80W.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6357P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8180M better than Xeon 6357P?
Yes. Xeon Platinum 8180M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 38.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8180M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8180M is the stronger fit. You are getting 38.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60.4% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8180M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Platinum 8180M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6357P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6357P vs Xeon Platinum 8180M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

The Xeon Platinum 8180M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 30,313 points. Launch price was $13,011.

Processing Power

The Xeon 6357P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180M has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon 6357P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6357P scores 30,401 against the Xeon Platinum 8180M's 30,313 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 25,000 (32.6% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,784 vs 1,000, a 94.3% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,769 vs 21,854 (52.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180M.

FeatureXeon 6357PXeon Platinum 8180M
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
28 / 56+250%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+34%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
38.5 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
30,401
30,313
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,000
25,000+39%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,784+178%
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,769
21,854+71%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6357P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — the Xeon 6357P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8180M supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon 6357P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon 6357P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) — the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P) and C620 (Xeon Platinum 8180M).

FeatureXeon 6357PXeon Platinum 8180M
Socket
LGA1700
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+80%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8180M targets Mission Critical Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700; Xeon Platinum 8180M rivals EPYC 7551.

FeatureXeon 6357PXeon Platinum 8180M
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Edge Server / Workstation
Mission Critical Datacenter