Xeon 6517P vs EPYC Embedded 8224P
Xeon 6517P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6517P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,195) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+14%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,195) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6517P and EPYC Embedded 8224P
Xeon 6517P
The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6517P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Xeon 6517P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6517P scores 48,810 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+25% | 2.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 72 MB (total)+13% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 48,810 | 48,869 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6517P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6517P versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the Xeon 6517P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6517P) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6517P) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+256% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 96+9% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6517P launched at $1195 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855. At current prices ($1195 vs $1048), the EPYC Embedded 8224P is $147 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6517P delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 13.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1195 | $855-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1195 | $1048-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8 | 46.6+14% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6517P and EPYC Embedded 8224P
