
Xeon 6520P

Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $715 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- β Delivers 59.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- β Draws 210W instead of 270W, a 60W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 40,000).
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- β +60% higher Geekbench multi-core.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6520P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- β28.6% higher power demand at 270W vs 210W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6520P better than Xeon Platinum 8380?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads β the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 β a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6520P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 β a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6520P. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,900 vs 1,300, a 37.5% lead for the Xeon 6520P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 40,000 (46.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 40 / 80+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+140% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024β2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 64,010+3% | 62,318 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900+46% | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | 40,000+60% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 β the Xeon 6520P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB β 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) β the Xeon 6520P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+38% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon 6520P was priced at $1295, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1295 vs $2010), Xeon 6520P was $715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 β making the Xeon 6520P the 45.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-36% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+59% | 31.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















