Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380

Intel

Xeon 6520P

24 Cores48 Thrd210 WWMax: 4 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8380

40 Cores80 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6520P

2025

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $715 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 59.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 210W instead of 270W, a 60W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 40,000).

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+60% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6520P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
  • ❌28.6% higher power demand at 270W vs 210W.
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6520P better than Xeon Platinum 8380?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6520P is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8380 pulls ahead with 60% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon 6520P also has the bigger cache pool with 140% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 60 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 60% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 40 cores and 80 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6520P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6520P comes in $715 cheaper on MSRP at $1,295 MSRP versus $2,010 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8380 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 60% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 59.4% better value on MSRP (49.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6520P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 144 MB L3 cache instead of 60 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6520P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon 6520P

The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8380

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

⚑

Processing Power

The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads β€” the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 β€” a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6520P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 β€” a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6520P. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,900 vs 1,300, a 37.5% lead for the Xeon 6520P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 40,000 (46.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureXeon 6520PXeon Platinum 8380
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
40 / 80+67%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
144 MB (total)+140%
60 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Granite Rapids (2024βˆ’2025)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
64,010+3%
62,318
Geekbench 6 Single
1,900+46%
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
25,000
40,000+60%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 β€” the Xeon 6520P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB β€” 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) β€” the Xeon 6520P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).

FeatureXeon 6520PXeon Platinum 8380
Socket
LGA4710
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+100%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4 TB
6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
88+38%
64
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureXeon 6520PXeon Platinum 8380
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
Datacenter
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6520P was priced at $1295, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1295 vs $2010), Xeon 6520P was $715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 β€” making the Xeon 6520P the 45.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon 6520PXeon Platinum 8380
MSRP
$1295-36%
$2010
Performance per Dollar
49.4+59%
31.0
Release Date
2025
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.