EPYC 9175F vs Xeon 6520P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6520P

24 Cores48 Thrd210 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon 6520P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

+2.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6520P

24 / 48

64,010

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon 6520P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon 6520P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 144 MB).
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
❌52.4% higher power demand at 320W vs 210W.

Xeon 6520P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,961 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 219.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 320W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (64,010 vs 65,894).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9175F better than Xeon 6520P?

Yes. EPYC 9175F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 26.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9175F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9175F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9175F is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6520P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9175F comes in 228.6% more expensive on MSRP at $4,256 MSRP versus $1,295 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6520P is also 219.3% better value on MSRP (49.4 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6520P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9175F vs Xeon 6520P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Xeon 6520P

The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon 6520P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — a 22.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon 6520P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+25%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+75%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+256%	144 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	65,894+3%	64,010
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Xeon 6520P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the EPYC 9175F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon 6520P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	4096 TB+102300%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon 6520P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Xeon 6520P came in at $1295. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $1295), Xeon 6520P was $2961 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 104.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Xeon 6520P
MSRP	$4256	$1295-70%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	49.4+219%
Release Date	2024	2025

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6520P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.