Xeon 6710E
VS
Core i9-13900KS

Xeon 6710E vs Core i9-13900KS

Intel

Xeon 6710E

64 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i9-13900KS

24 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6710E

#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
108%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
108%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
108%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
107%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
105%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
104%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
103%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
103%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
101%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
101%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
100%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
99%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
97%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
97%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
96%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
95%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
94%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
94%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
92%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
91%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
90%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900KS

#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
106%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
106%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
106%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
106%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
106%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
105%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
102%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
102%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
101%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
100%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
100%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
100%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
100%
#172
Core i9-13900KS
MSRP: $699|Avg: $580
100%
#173
Ryzen 5 2400G
MSRP: $169|Avg: $84
100%
#174
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
MSRP: $699|Avg: $675
100%
#175
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $105.5
99%
#176
Core i7-13700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
99%
#177
Athlon 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
98%
#178
Core i5-13500E
MSRP: $235|Avg: $235
98%
#179
Core i5-12500E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $200
98%
#180
Core i9-11900
MSRP: $439|Avg: $220
98%
#181
Core i7-12700E
MSRP: $314|Avg: $278
98%
#182
Core i3-14100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $135
97%
#183
Core i5-13400T
MSRP: $221|Avg: $200
97%
#184
Core i3-12300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
96%
#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
96%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
95%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($344) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6710E is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($344)
⚠️ Higher cost ($580)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13900KS ($580), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($236 less, 69% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+71%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($344)
⚠️ Higher cost ($580)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6710E and Core i9-13900KS

Intel

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

Intel

Core i9-13900KS

The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.

Processing Power

The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i9-13900KS offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS — a 57.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Core i9-13900KS uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Core i9-13900KS's 60,543 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon 6710E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,225 vs 3,123, a 87.3% lead for the Core i9-13900KS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,400 vs 21,421 (69.3% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS.

FeatureXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
Cores / Threads
64 / 64+167%
24 / 32
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
5.8 GHz+81%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
96 MB (total)+167%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (per module)+100%
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 3 nm-57%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Sierra Forest (2024)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
61,404+1%
60,543
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,998
Geekbench 6 Single
1,225
3,123+155%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,400
21,421+106%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900KS uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6710E) vs 2 (Core i9-13900KS). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 20 (Core i9-13900KS) — the Xeon 6710E offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS).

FeatureXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
Socket
LGA4710
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+2033%
192 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
88+340%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900KS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6710E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E) vs true (Core i9-13900KS). The Core i9-13900KS includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6710E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.

FeatureXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
High Efficiency Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6710E launched at $1565 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900KS debuted at $699. At current prices ($344 vs $580), the Xeon 6710E is $236 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 178.5 pts/$ vs 104.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900KS — making the Xeon 6710E the 52.4% better value option.

FeatureXeon 6710ECore i9-13900KS
MSRP
$1565
$699-55%
Avg Price (30d)
$344-41%
$580
Performance per Dollar
178.5+71%
104.4
Release Date
2024
2023